These are complemented with light tanks, typically in the role of (armed) reconnaissance.ĭevelopment of tank classification schemes ĭevelopment of a tank classification system started in World War I, when tanks were separated into light tanks and tankettes, medium tanks, and heavy tanks, based on size and weight. All main battle tanks are typically armed with weapons with similar characteristics but some may be armoured more than others. With the worldwide adoption of the modern main battle tank designs, which favour a modular universal design, these sorts of classifications are mostly eliminated from modern terminology. No one classification system works across all periods or all nations in particular, weight-based classification was inconsistent between countries and eras. As World War II progressed, the separation of "infantry" and "cruiser" roles generally disappeared and the "universal tank" started to take over.Ĭlassification has always been determined by the prevailing theories of armoured warfare, which have been altered in turn by rapid advances in technology. An early division in the definition of roles was between infantry tanks intended to focus on supporting infantry in the assault, and cruiser tanks intended for classic cavalry missions of exploitation, screening and reconnaissance. Many classification systems have been used over a hundred years of tank history. The weight classification is used in the same way truck classification is used, and is intended to accommodate logistic requirements of the tanks. The classification by role was used primarily during the developmental stage of the national armoured forces, and referred to the doctrinal and force structure utility of the tanks based on design emphasis.
Tank classification is a taxonomy of identifying either the intended role or weight class of tanks.
0 kommentar(er)
